Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov;180(3):1307–1317. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.093179

TABLE 1.

Length, arm ratio, percentage of heterochromatin, knob, and centromere position of potato (USW1 and RH) and tomato chromosome 6

Genotypea n Total chr. length (μm) LAa (μm) SAa (μm) Arm ratio Het. totalb (%) Het. LA (%) Het. SA (%) Knob positionc (%) Cen positionc (%)
S. tuberosum (RH) 11 47.2 ± 2.9 37.9 ± 2.5 9.3 ± 0.9 4.1:1 27.0 ± 4.1 20.5 ± 3.9 53.3 ± 5.8 49.7 ± 2.4 19.7 ± 1.5
S. tuberosum (USW1) 16 42.8 ± 3.8 34.1 ± 3.4 8.8 ± 0.7 3.9:1 27.7 ± 2.9 21.3 ± 3.5 52.4 ± 4.9 53.6 ± 4.3 20.5 ± 1.5
S. lycopersicum (Koralik) 11 45.5 ± 3.9 37.2 ± 3.7 8.7 ± 0.7 4.3:1 26.8 ± 2.6 22.5 ± 3.1 44.9 ± 2.9 NA 19.2 ± 2.4
a

LA, long arm; SA, short arm.

b

[Total heterochromatin (μm)/total chromosome length (μm)] × 100.

c

Knob (centromere) position (%) is (S/T) × 100, where S = distance of knob (centromere) (in micrometers) from the end of the short arm, and T = length of chromosome 6 (in micrometers). NA, the knob was not observed in tomato.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure