TABLE 3.
Comparative FISH mapping of potato BAC clones in potato and tomato
| Relative physical location (%)a
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAC clone | Chromosome arm/region | Potato USW1 | n | Tomato cv. Koralik | n |
| RH160K03, RH177C17 | Short arm | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 10 | 10.1 ± 0.7 | 6 |
| RH081K17, RH136O23 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 11 | 8.6 ± 0.8 | 6 | |
| 39P07 | 4.2 ± 0.7 | 7 | 6.9 ± 1.1 | 5 | |
| RH084L03 | 5.6 ± 0.9 | 7 | 5.7 ± 0.8 | 6 | |
| RH034P18, RH125D13 | 8.1 ± 0.9 | 14 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 10 | |
| Hetero-euchromatin boundary | 9.8 ± 1.4 | 16 | 10.3 ± 1.6 | 11 | |
| Centromere | 20.5 ± 1.5 | 16 | 19.2 ± 2.4 | 11 | |
| Hetero-euchromatin boundary | 37.5 ± 1.2 | 16 | 37.4 ± 3.6 | 11 | |
| RH094G20 | Long arm | 52.5 ± 1.6 | 4 | 45.2 ± 2.7 | 6 |
| Knob | 53.6 ± 4.3 | 16 | b | b | |
| RH102I10 | 57.7 ± 1.4 | 11 | 51.2 ± 4.2 | 6 | |
| RH194M18 | 67.2 ± 0.8 | 7 | NA | NA | |
| RH103A21 | 70.9 ± 2.2 | 8 | NA | NA | |
| RH060H14 | 80.5 ± 1.0 | 7 | 77.4 ± 2.1 | 5 | |
| RH200K19 | 86.4 ± 1.0 | 6 | 84.7 ± 2.7 | 7 | |
| RH204G20 | 91.5 ± 1.0 | 6 | 92.0 ± 2.8 | 3 | |
NA, measurement data not available. However, the relative order of these BACs in tomato was the same as in potato.
a
Relative physical location is determined as specified in Table 1. BAC clones are listed following the order in potato. All measurements for tomato were made on pachytene chromosomes 6 of average length of 45.2 ± 5.1 μm.
b
The knob is not present in tomato.