Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 3;168(10):1179–1189. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn229

Table 3.

Risk of Incident Alzheimer's Disease According to Central Obesity and Change in Waist Circumference at Different Ages (Cox Proportional Hazards Models), Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, 1958–2006a

Range of Valuesb WC (cm)
Men Range of Valuesb Women
HR 95% CI P Value HR 95% CI P Value
Quintile of WC statusc Range, cm
Range, cm
    At age 30 years
        Q1 (<20th percentile) 60.6–77.4 1 45.4–61.2 1
        Q2 77.4–81.0 0.69 0.42, 1.14 0.148 61.3–64.8 1.71 0.93, 3.12 0.083
        Q3 81.0–84.8 0.55* 0.31, 0.99 0.048 64.8–70.3 1.38 0.64, 2.97 0.412
        Q4 84.8–89.9 1.26 0.72, 2.22 0.413 70.3–77.3 2.23 0.81, 6.18 0.112
        Q5 (>80th percentile) 89.9–126.3 0.64 0.28, 1.46 0.294 77.4–112.9 4.60* 1.28, 16.43 0.019
    At age 35 years
        Q1 (<20th percentile) 64.4–79.2 1 50.1–63.3 1
        Q2 79.2–82.8 0.84 0.52, 1.37 0.486 63.3–67.0 1.05 0.56, 1.95 0.885
        Q3 82.8–86.6 0.62 0.34, 1.12 0.115 67.0–72.8 1.22 0.61, 2.45 0.577
        Q4 86.6–91.8 1.16 0.65, 2.06 0.611 72.8–79.9 2.07 0.75, 5.71 0.159
        Q5 (>80th percentile) 91.9–126.2 0.95 0.43, 2.08 0.898 80.1–114.4 3.17 0.91, 11.03 0.069
    At age 40 years
        Q1 (<20th percentile) 67.2–80.9 1 53.7–65.3 1
        Q2 80.9–84.6 0.73 0.45, 1.21 0.228 65.3–69.2 0.89 0.48, 1.65 0.706
        Q3 84.6–88.4 0.85 0.50, 1.45 0.556 69.2–75.2 0.91 0.44, 1.89 0.795
        Q4 88.4–93.6 0.99 0.56, 1.75 0.978 73.3–82.7 2.18 0.80, 5.97 0.127
        Q5 (>80th percentile) 93.6–127.5 0.57 0.20, 1.62 0.294 82.8–115.8 2.52 0.73, 8.68 0.141
    At age 45 years
        Q1 (<20th percentile) 68.5–82.7 1 55.8–67.2 1
        Q2 82.7–86.5 0.92 0.56, 1.52 0.760 67.2–71.4 1.08 0.59, 1.97 0.808
        Q3 86.5–90.2 0.90 0.52, 1.55 0.702 71.4–77.8 0.76 0.34, 1.71 0.513
        Q4 90.2–95.6 1.07 0.60, 1.88 0.819 77.8–84.9 2.75* 1.07, 7.06 0.035
        Q5 (>80th percentile) 95.6–131.3 0.64 0.22, 1.82 0.400 85.0–117.3 2.45 0.71, 8.39 0.155
    At age 50 years
        Q1 (<20th percentile) 69.8–84.1 1 57.9–69.2 1
        Q2 84.2–88.3 0.85 0.52, 1.40 0.527 69.2–73.7 1.15 0.63, 2.11 0.647
        Q3 88.3–92.2 0.79 0.45, 1.36 0.396 73.8–80.1 0.88 0.41, 1.92 0.753
        Q4 92.2–97.7 1.00 0.57, 1.76 0.987 80.1–87.2 2.53 1.00, 6.44 0.051
        Q5 (>80th percentile) 97.7–138.9 0.48 0.95, 1.07 0.235 87.2–118.8 3.04 0.87, 10.59 0.080
Change in WCc Range, %
Range, %
    Between ages 30 and 35 years
        <10th percentile −1.40 to 1.13 1.55 0.89; 2.69 0.118 −2.98 to 1.10 1.37 0.41, 4.54 0.609
        10th–90th percentile 1.13 to 4.06 1 1.14 to 4.05 1
        >90th percentile 4.07 to 6.94 1.82 0.83, 4.01 0.133 4.08 to 16.20 0.50* 0.26, 0.96 0.037
    Between ages 35 and 40 years
        <10th percentile −1.40 to 1.13 1.56 0.90, 2.71 0.110 −2.96 to 1.10 1.37 0.41, 4.54 0.609
        10th–90th percentile 1.13 to 3.92 1 1.15 to 3.92 1
        >90th percentile 3.93 to 6.51 1.83 0.83, 4.01 0.133 3.94 to 13.97 0.50* 0.26, 0.96 0.037
    Between ages 40 and 45 years
        <10th percentile −1.40 to 1.13 1.55 0.89, 2.69 0.118 −3.03 to 1.11 1.37 0.41, 4.55 0.605
        10th–90th percentile 1.14 to 3.78 1 1.16 to 3.78 1
        >90th percentile 3.79 to 6.07 1.82 0.83, 4.01 0.133 3.79 to 12.28 0.49* 0.26, 0.93 0.031
    Between ages 45 and 50 years
        <10th percentile −1.41 to 1.13 1.60 0.92, 2.78 0.093 −3.11 to 1.11 1.37 0.41, 4.55 0.605
        10th–90th percentile 1.13 to 3.67 1 1.17 to 3.67 1
        >90th percentile 3.70 to 5.78 1.83 0.84, 4.03 0.130 3.67 to 10.95 0.49* 0.26, 0.94 0.031

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; Q, quintile; WC, waist circumference.

P ≤ 0.10 (borderline-significant); *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

a

z scores were computed for change, and significant decrease and increase corresponded to the 10th and 90th percentiles (based on the whole Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging sample (n = 3,005)), respectively, of the standardized distribution of change. Numbers of subjects and failures were 1,343 and 110, respectively, for men and 669 and 64, respectively, for models with women only.

b

Cutpoints may vary or overlap because of rounding.

c

WC change was estimated by taking the difference between empirical Bayes predicted values for WC at each age (using model E in Web Appendix 2) and then computing percent change from baseline. Models with WC status and change as exposures controlled for education (years), ethnicity (non-Hispanic black vs. other), and smoking status (former or current smoker vs. nonsmoker).