Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Apr 4;129(17):5334–5335. doi: 10.1021/ja0709167

Table 2.

Substrate Scopea

graphic file with name nihms63739f3.jpg
entry R R1 product yield (%)b d.r.c
1 Ph (1a) Ph (2a) 4 79 >20:1
2 4-OMePh(1b) Ph (2a) 5 76 >20:1
3 3-OMePh(1c) Ph (2a) 6 79 >20:1
4 2-OMePh (1d) Ph (2a) 7 94 >20:1
5 2-naphthyl (1e) Ph (2a) 8 77 >20:1
6 CH2CH2CH3(1f) Ph (2a) 9 67 >20:1
7 HC=CHCH3(1g) Ph (2a) 10 51 >20:1
8 4-CIPh(1h) Ph (2a) 11 0 -
9 Ph (1a) 4-BrPh (2b) 12 87 >20:1
10 Ph (1a) 4-FPh (2c) 13 82 >20:1
11 Ph (1a) 3-CF3Ph (2d) 14 93 >20:1
12 Ph (1a) 3-BrPh (2e) 15 78 >20:1
13 Ph (1a) 3-CH3Ph (2f) 16 76 >20:1
14 Ph (1a) 3-OMePh (2g) 17 67 >20:1
15 Ph (1a) cyclohexyl (2h) 18 0 -
a

2 equiv. 1 and 1 equiv. 2,0.25 M.

b

Isolated yield after purification.

c

Determined by 500 MHz

1H NMR spectroscopy. Relative stereochemistry of 16 determined by X-ray crystallography and further assigned by analogy. See Supporting Information for details.