Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 5;105(45):17430–17435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804488105

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Headspace analysis of WT and transgenic Arabidopsis rosettes with and without herbivory. Volatile emission rates based on leaf area basis (A) and per plant (B). White, uninfested WT plant; black, P. rapae-infested WT plant; hatched, uninfested transgenic plant; gray, P. rapae infested transgenic plant. MT, monoterpenes (α-pinene, camphene, β-myrcene, limonene, linalool); SQT, sesquiterpene (α-farnesene); oxyVOCs, other oxygenated volatile organic compounds (10 compounds). Four independent experiments per treatment and line were analyzed, and means ± SE are given. Significant differences (P < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test) between treatments are indicated by different letters per compound class. (For GC-MS profiles and compound list see Fig. S2 and Table S1).