Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;87(2):802–818. doi: 10.1152/jn.00409.2001

FIG. 15.

FIG. 15

Effects of low-frequency stimulation in the FPA on the latency of saccades. A and C: horizontal eye position aligned on the onset of 4° target step. The top set of superimposed traces shows control responses and the bottom set shows responses during stimulation. The bold horizontal bars indicate the time of stimulation. Data are from the same site as in Fig. 1. B and D: summary of the stimulation effects on saccade latency. Means of saccade latencies in the stimulation trials are plotted as a function of those in controls. Data are presented in separate panels according to the direction of saccades relative to the direction of the stimulation-evoked smooth eye movements (“same” vs. “opposite”). The dashed line in each graph has unity slope, and would obtain if there were no changes in latency. Error bars show ±1 SD. The filled symbols and open symbols plot data from sites showing effects that were or were not statistically significant differences (Kormogorov-Smirnov test, P < 0.05).