Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 12;93(11):4238–4244. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1090

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients without diabetes (group 1), with unrecognized probable diabetes (group 2), and with known diabetes (group 3) by HbA1c and chart review

Group 1: no diabetes; n = 436 (63%) Group 2: unrecognized probable diabetes; n = 123 (18%) Group 3: recognized diabetes; n = 136 (19%) P value across groupsa P value: difference between groups 1 and 2b P value: difference between groups 2 and 3b
Age (yr) 59 ± 18 67 ± 15 64 ± 15 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.3
Female sex 51% 58% 35% 0.0002 0.3 0.0002
White race 88% 86% 82% 0.3 0.7 0.99
HbA1c 5.57 ± 0.39 6.48 ± 0.41 7.40 ± 1.66 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Comorbidity by billing code
CVD, MI, or CHF 19% 29% 35% <0.0001 0.02 0.6
PVD 8% 20% 16% 0.0003 0.0002 0.8
COPD 17% 27% 19% 0.06 0.04 0.3
Renal disease 6% 11% 23% <0.0001 0.1 0.01
Charlson score 13.3 ± 2.6 4.3 ± 2.5 5.1 ± 2.5 <0.0001 0.0004 0.05
Insurance
Commercial 49% 44% 38% 0.03 0.3 0.99
Medicare 41% 50% 56%
Medicaid 5% 6% 4%
Free care 4% 1%
Hospital use
Length of stay 5.3 ± 5.8 5.9 ± 7.4 5.4 ± 6.7 0.7 0.7 0.08
Total charges $51,007 ± 76,202 $55,008 ± 73,075 $46,523 ± 40,913 0.6 0.8 0.6

Undiagnosed probable diabetes is defined as HbA1c of more than 6.1% with no indication of diabetes in the medical record. CHF, Congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; MI, myocardial infarction; PVD, peripheral vascular disease. 

a

P value by χ2 for categorical data and ANOVA for continuous data. 

b

Difference between Tukey-Kramer adjusted P value for difference between groups for continuous variables and χ2 P value multiplied by 2 for categorical variables.