Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 28;4:224. doi: 10.1038/msb.2008.62

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Programming transfer functions through combinatorial design strategies. (A) Combinatorial tuning strategies enable fine-tuning of the component transfer function. Stepwise nucleotide changes were made to S4, where each change fell under a different competing strand tuning strategy. (B) Tuned theophylline response curves as described in Figure 1D. Arrows depict the systematic modifications designated in (A). (C) Circuit configuration of shRNA switches responsive to theophylline (S4) or hypoxanthine (X1) that both target EGFP. (D) Predicted transfer function on the basis of application of the mathematical model to the circuit depicted in (C). Fit curves represent the individual component transfer functions for S4 (Inline graphic) and X1 (Inline graphic), respectively. (E) Combinatorial implementation of shRNA switches enables construction of networks that process multiple molecular inputs. Results are shown for HEK293T tTA-d2EGFP cells transfected with each shRNA construct (250 ng) or cotransfected with both shRNA constructs (125 ng of each) in the presence of water (▪), 3 mM theophylline (Inline graphic), 2 mM hypoxanthine (Inline graphic), or both theophylline and hypoxanthine (□). Error bars represent one s.d. from duplicate transfected wells.