Table 2.
Animal | 17/18, P | 19/21, P | Feedback, P | |
Experiment 1 | 60 | <0.0000001 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 |
62 | <0.0002 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | |
70 | <0.0001 | <0.00001 | <0.001 | |
98 | <0.000002 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | |
Experiment 2 | 79 | <0.0000001 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 |
89 | <0.0000002 | <0.001 | <0.0001 | |
101 | <0.01 | * | <0.00001 | |
106 | <0.0000001 | <0.00001 | <0.01 | |
116 | <0.0000001 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | |
130 | <0.005 | <0.00001 | <0.0001 | |
Experiment 3 | 101 | <0.002 | * | <0.00001 |
106 | <0.0000001 | <0.00001 | <0.0001 | |
116 | <0.0000001 | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | |
130 | <0.0000001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Experiment 4 | 79 | <0.01 | ||
89 | <0.000005 | |||
101 | <0.01 | |||
106 | <0.01 | |||
116 | <0.001 | |||
130 | <0.000005 |
area 19/21 border was outside of region monitored by the photodiode array.