Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr 18;97(10):5357–5362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.090013497

Table 1.

Distribution of bridge-breakage instability* in solid tumors

Diagnosis Karotypic features
Bridge-breakage instability in low-passage cultures Bridge-breakage instability in cell lines
High intercellular heterogeneity 30 /31 11 /14
 Low/borderline malignant 19 /19
  Atypical lipomatous tumor r 17 /17
  MFH r and tas 1 /1
  Desmoid tumor tas 1 /1
 Highly malignant 11 /12 11 /14
  Leiomyosarcoma Complex 2 /2
  MFH Complex 3 /3
  Malignant melanoma Complex 1 /1
  Osteosarcoma Complex 2 /2 2 /2
  Ovarian carcinoma Complex 1 /1
  Pancreatic carcinoma Complex 7 /10
  Sarcoma, NOS Complex 4 /5
Low intercellular heterogeneity 0 /9 0 /2
 Benign 0 /5
  Hibernoma t(6;14;11) 0 /1
  Leiomyoma t(12;14) 0 /1
  Lipoma t(1;6;5) 0 /3
t(2;6)
del(14q)
 Low malignant 0 /1
  Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans r(17;22) 0 /1
 Highly malignant 0 /3 0 /2
  Myxoid liposarcoma t(12;16) 0 /2 0 /1
  Synovial sarcoma t(X;18) 0 /1
  Ewing sarcoma Complex with t(11;22) 0 /1
*

More than 2% of anaphase figures with bridges and more than 4% of metaphase cells containing at least one ring chromosome, dicentric chromosome, or telomeric association. 

t, translocation; del, deletion; r, ring chromosome; tas, telomeric association; a complex karyotype contains more than five structural aberrations.