TABLE 3.

Results of water quality analysis of stream samples collected monthly in WS1 and WS2 over a 17-month period

Site	n	pH		Temp (°C)		Turbidity			Enterococcal density (CFU/100 ml)a
		Mean	95% confidence interval	Mean	95% confidence interval	Geometric meanb	95% confidence interval		Geometric meanb	95% confidence interval
							Lower boundary	Upper boundary		Lower boundary	Upper boundary
WS1 sites
1	17	6.04	±0.28	12.85	±2.44	44.15	17.97	108.48	74	9	640
2	17	6.48	±0.14	13.64	±2.59	30.73	16.52	57.18	2,600	1,011	6,685
3	17	6.45	±0.16	14.21	±2.79	26.56	14.89	47.40	1,423	795	2,547
4	17	7.32	±0.54	15.75	±4.05	162.15	106.82	246.14	93	42	207
WS2 sites
1	17	5.15	±0.20	16.14	±1.50	0.12	0.03	0.49	1	0	6
2	17	6.41	±0.29	13.59	±2.82	58.40	26.85	127.01	81	10	658
3	17	6.44	±0.30	13.06	±3.07	17.44	9.95	30.56	41	14	118
4	17	6.41	±0.13	14.25	±2.45	6.13	4.24	8.87	225	83	612
5	15	6.60	±0.69	16.66	±3.42	11.20	8.26	15.19	2	0	15
6	15	6.78	±0.39	17.89	±3.85	11.51	8.37	15.82	5	1	36
7	15	6.49	±0.21	17.08	±3.52	8.05	5.90	10.99	89	38	208
8	12	6.72	±0.21	15.99	±3.95	5.82	3.78	8.98	89	7	1,142
9	12	6.70	±0.20	16.11	±3.86	6.63	4.97	8.84	121	18	822
10	15	6.60	±0.23	14.67	±3.32	8.43	5.43	13.10	229	89	588
11	15	7.56	±0.54	17.45	±4.11	5.55	4.11	7.50	4	1	24
12	15	6.71	±0.16	14.03	±2.86	7.49	5.74	9.75	5	1	30

^aEnterococcal densities recorded as too numerous to count were converted to 20,000 for WS1 and to 2,500 for WS2 based on the maximum enterococcal numbers observed in each watershed.

^bValues of zero were converted to 0.01.