Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 22;76(12):5745–5753. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00897-08

TABLE 3.

Immunization of chickens with RASV strains and E. acervulina oocyst challenge

Group Primary immunizationa Secondary immunization Oocyst challengeb Weight gain (g) (mean ± SEM)c Feed conversion ratioc
G1 BSG BSG No 141 ± 7 Ad 2.93 A
G2 χ8879(pYA3870) (T3SS-vector control) χ9242(pYA3493) (T2SS-vector control) Yes 127 ± 2 B 2.94 A
G3 χ8879(pYA3658) (T3SS-EAMZ250) χ8879(pYA4157) (T3SS-SO7) Yes 140 ± 3 A 2.75 A
G4 χ8879(pYA3658) (T3SS-EAMZ250) χ9242(pYA4184) (T2SS-SO7) Yes 136 ± 5 AB 2.76 A
G5 χ8879(pYA4157) (T3SS-SO7) χ9242(pYA4184) (T2SS-SO7) Yes 132 ± 1 AB 2.71 A
G6 χ9242(pYA4184) (T2SS-SO7) χ9242(pYA4184) (T2SS-SO7) Yes 135 ± 1 AB 2.85 A
a

Chickens received a primary immunization when they were 1 week old and a secondary immunization 1 week later. Strains χ8879 (ΔsptP1033::xylE ΔasdA16 ΔphoP233) and χ9242 (ΔphoP233 ΔasdA16 ΔaraBAD23 ΔrelA198::araC PBAD lacI TT) were used for immunization.

b

Three weeks after the secondary immunization, chickens in groups G2 to G6 were inoculated with 105 E. acervulina oocysts.

c

Right before the oocyst challenge and on day 6 postchallenge, the body weights were recorded, and the weight gain and feed conversion ratio (grams of feed consumed per gram of body weight gained) were calculated.

d

Means that are not followed by the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).