Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 6;168(6):611–619. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn182

TABLE 3.

Propensity score-weighted regression estimates for poor health in 1997 (n = 6,092), Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1980–1997

Propensity score-weighted estimate
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
OR* 95% CI* OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
1985–1997 average tract poverty (%)
    <20 1.00 1.00 1.00
    ≥20 1.74 1.33, 2.27 1.63 1.21, 2.19 1.64 1.19, 2.24
Race/ethnicity
    White 1.00
    Black 1.08 0.81, 1.43
Sex
    Female 0.80 0.60, 1.08
    Male 1.00
Age 1.10 1.03, 1.16
Age squared 1.00 1.00, 1.00
Family poverty income ratio (%)
    ≤100 1.32 0.86, 2.02 1.65 1.02, 2.68
    >100–200 1.34 0.94, 1.91 1.59 1.07, 2.37
    >200–300 1.29 0.91, 1.85 1.49 1.03, 2.18
    >300 1.00 1.00
Socioeconomic characteristics
    Female-headed household 0.81 0.51, 1.29
    Welfare recipient 1.62 0.99, 2.64
Quintile of family wealth
    1 1.08 0.63, 1.88
    2 0.83 0.48, 1.44
    3 0.86 0.49, 1.48
    4 1.00
Education (years)
    <12 2.26 1.71, 3.00 1.62 1.18, 2.23
    12 1.00 1.00
    13–15 0.74 0.51, 1.08 0.82 0.56, 1.21
    16 0.46 0.23, 0.95 0.48 0.23, 1.00
    ≥17 0.96 0.38, 2.46 0.67 0.27, 1.66
Labor force status
    Employed 1.00 1.00
    Unemployed 1.06 0.72, 1.57 1.15 0.78, 1.71
    Not in the labor force 1.40 1.02, 1.92 1.14 0.79, 1.65
Baseline health
    Fair/poor 4.99 3.69, 6.75 3.68 2.64, 5.13
    Not fair/poor 1.00 1.00
Baseline neighborhood poverty rate (%)
    <10 1.00 1.00
    10–<20 0.95 0.69, 1.31 0.83 0.59, 1.17
    ≥20 0.76 0.57, 1.01 0.67 0.48, 0.92
*

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.