Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2008 Sep 18;29(36):4847–4854. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.019

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Figure 6

Comparison of fatigue crack growth response and chemistry of enamel with bone and dentin.

(a) the data in Figure 3 are compared with results from fatigue crack growth in human dentin [20] (R=0.1, frequency 5 Hz) and human cortical bone [28] (R=0.1, frequency 1 Hz)

b) XRD patterns of enamel, bovine bone and dentin. * This small reflection comes from the aluminum holder