Table 3.
Differences in sexual context of the most recent sex partner across HIV risk groups
| Highest risk group N = 111 % (n) | Consistent condom use group N = 54 % (n) | Inconsistent condom use group N = 93 % (n) | χ2 test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner type | 50.89*** | |||
| Main partner | 44 % (49) | 41 % (22) | 86 % (80) | |
| Casual partner | 45 % (50) | 56 % (30) | 14 % (13) | |
| Trade partner | 11 % (12) | 4 % (2) | 0 % | |
| Main partner | 2.74 | |||
| HIV seroconcordant | 51 % (25) | 36 % (8) | 56 % (45) | |
| HIV serodiscordant | 49 % (24) | 64 % (14) | 44 % (35) | |
| HIV seroconcordant | 16.04*** | |||
| Condom use – yes | 16 % (4) | 88 % (7) | 24 % (11) | |
| Condom use - no | 84 % (21) | 12 % (1) | 76 % (34) | |
| HIV serodiscordant | 15.27*** | |||
| Condom use – yes | 54 % (13) | 93 % (13) | 31 % (11) | |
| Condom use - no | 46 % (11) | 7 % (1) | 69 % (24) | |
| Casual partner | 7.12* | |||
| HIV seroconcordant | 36 % (18) | 10 % (3) | 38 % (5) | |
| HIV serodiscordant | 64 % (32) | 90 % (27) | 62 % (8) | |
| HIV seroconcordant | 5.08 | |||
| Condom use – yes | 33 % (6) | 100 % (3) | 60 % (3) | |
| Condom use - no | 67 % (12) | 0 % | 40 % (2) | |
| HIV serodiscordant | 18.93*** | |||
| Condom use – yes | 44 % (14) | 96 % (26) | 50 % (4) | |
| Condom use - no | 56 % (18) | 4 % (1) | 50 % (4) | |
| Trade partner | 0.63 | |||
| HIV seroconcordant | 25 % (3) | 0 % | 0 % | |
| HIV serodiscordant | 75 % (9) | 100 % (2) | 0 % | |
| HIV seroconcordant | a) | |||
| Condom use – yes | 0% | 0 % | 0 % | |
| Condom use - no | 100 % (3) | 0 % | 0 % | |
| HIV serodiscordant | a) | |||
| Condom use – yes | 78 % (7) | 100 % (2) | 0 % | |
| Condom use - no | 22 % (2) | 0 % | 0 % | |
| Main partner | 1.34 | |||
| Serostatus known | 90 % (44) | 91 % (20) | 95 % (76) | |
| Serostatus unknown | 10 % (5) | 9 % (2) | 5 % (4) | |
| Serostatus known | 28.28*** | |||
| Condom use – yes | 32 % (14) | 90 % (18) | 26 % (20) | |
| Condom use - no | 68 % (30) | 10 % (2) | 74 % (56) | |
| Serostatus unknown | 1.49 | |||
| Condom use – yes | 60 % (3) | 100 % (2) | 50 % (2) | |
| Condom use - no | 40 % (2) | 0 % | 50 % (2) | |
| Casual partner | 7.16* | |||
| Serostatus known | 56 % (28) | 50 % (15) | 92 % (12) | |
| Serostatus unknown | 44 % (22) | 50 % (15) | 8 % (1) | |
| Serostatus known | 13.59** | |||
| Condom use – yes | 43 % (12) | 100 % (15) | 58 % (7) | |
| Condom use - no | 57 % (16) | 0 % | 42 % (5) | |
| Serostatus unknown | 13.29** | |||
| Condom use – yes | 36 % (8) | 93 % (14) | 0 % | |
| Condom use - no | 64 % (14) | 7 % (1) | 100 % (1) | |
| Trade partner | 0.64 | |||
| Serostatus known | 75 % (9) | 100 % (2) | 0 % | |
| Serostatus unknown | 25 % (3) | 0 % | 0 % | |
| Serostatus known | 1.40 | |||
| Condom use – yes | 56 % (5) | 100 % (2) | 0 % | |
| Condom use - no | 44 % (4) | 0 % | 0 % | |
| Serostatus unknown | a) | |||
| Condom use – yes | 67 % (2) | 0 % | 0 % | |
| Condom use - no | 33 % (1) | 0 % | 0 % |
a)
too few cells
*
p < .05
**
p < .01
***
p < .001