Table 2.
Comparison of 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla in volunteers (n = 10)
| Image quality (1-4) | Artifact score (1-4) | Artifact width (mm) | CER | SNR * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
3.0 Tesla k-t SENSE |
3.6 (±0.3) |
0.5 (±0.2) |
1.6 (±0.3) |
1.1 (±0.4) |
11.6 (±1.5) |
|
1.5 Tesla k-t SENSE |
3.4 (±0.4) |
0.5 (±0.2) |
1.5 (±0.4) |
1.5 (±0.6) |
5.6 (±0.6) |
| p value | 0.37 | 0.67 | 0.52 | 0.012 | n/a |
|
3.0 Tesla SENSE |
3.1 (±0.4) |
1.0 (±0.4) |
2.4 (±0.4) |
1.1 (±045) |
n/a |
|
p value vs. 3.0 Tesla k-t SENSE |
0.04 | 0.02 | <0.001 | 0.96 | n/a |
n=4
CER = contrast enhancement ratio
Upslope = mean upslope of signal-intensity profiles in mid-ventricular section
SNR = myocardial signal-to-noise ratio measured at peak contrast enhancement