Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2008 Nov;249(2):493–500. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2492080017

Table 2.

Comparison of 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla in volunteers (n = 10)

Image quality (1-4) Artifact score (1-4) Artifact width (mm) CER SNR *
3.0 Tesla
k-t SENSE
3.6
(±0.3)
0.5
(±0.2)
1.6
(±0.3)
1.1
(±0.4)
11.6
(±1.5)
1.5 Tesla
k-t SENSE
3.4
(±0.4)
0.5
(±0.2)
1.5
(±0.4)
1.5
(±0.6)
5.6
(±0.6)
p value 0.37 0.67 0.52 0.012 n/a
3.0 Tesla
SENSE
3.1
(±0.4)
1.0
(±0.4)
2.4
(±0.4)
1.1
(±045)
n/a
p value vs. 3.0 Tesla
k-t SENSE
0.04 0.02 <0.001 0.96 n/a
*

n=4

CER = contrast enhancement ratio

Upslope = mean upslope of signal-intensity profiles in mid-ventricular section

SNR = myocardial signal-to-noise ratio measured at peak contrast enhancement