Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):392–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02098.x

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results of Experiment 1. Error in degrees for localizing missing items. Error bars represent 1 s.e.m. a) Error in localizing individual targets and distractors. Performance was better for targets than distractors, and was better than chance for both targets and distractors. b) Error in localizing the centroid of targets and distractors. Performance was not significantly different for targets and distractors, and was better than chance for both targets and distractors.