Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 1):594–601. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_71

Table 3.

Average percentage difference in GKM values compared to GKM values calculated using the semi-automatically determined AIF.

% Difference Manual Automatic Semi-Auto on different axial slices
Ktrans 13.6±15.1 16.7±8.7 15.8±18.1
kep 11.9±9.6 9.08±10.4 18.9±10.9
ve 6.2±8.0 9.0±8.5 9.4±9.5