Table 3.
Comparison of RH II and RH I (Chowdhary et al. 2003)
Map size (cR) | No. of RH groups | Average marker density (kb) | No of markers | Type I | Type II | FISH anchors | Markers shared with linkage maps | Comparative loci | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH II | 38,361.4 | 101 | 775 | 3816 | 1937 | 1879 | 857 | 920 | 1904 |
RH I | 14,587.1 | 101 | 4,044 | 730 | 258 | 472 | 253 | - | 447 |
Improvement | 2.6 | - | 5.2 | 5.2 | 7.5 | 3.9 | 3.4 | - | 4.3 |