Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008 Oct 14;122(1):28–36. doi: 10.1159/000151313

Table 3.

Comparison of RH II and RH I (Chowdhary et al. 2003)

Map size (cR) No. of RH groups Average marker density (kb) No of markers Type I Type II FISH anchors Markers shared with linkage maps Comparative loci
RH II 38,361.4 101 775 3816 1937 1879 857 920 1904
RH I 14,587.1 101 4,044 730 258 472 253 - 447
Improvement 2.6 - 5.2 5.2 7.5 3.9 3.4 - 4.3
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure