Table 1.
No. | Subcomplexes | Calculated mass, Da | Observed mass, Da |
---|---|---|---|
0 | (k, l, e, d, c, a, b, i, g, j, f, h, m) | 794,310 | 797,999 ± 180 |
1 | (k, l, e, d, c, b, i, g, f, h, m) | 598,898 | 600,501 ± 93 |
2 | (e, d, c, b, i, g, f, h, m) | 507,286 | 508,830 ± 23 |
3 | (k, l, e, d, c, h, f, m) | 434,379 | 434,885 ± 157 |
4 | (k, l, e, d, c, h, f) | 391,695 | 392,199 ± 36 |
5 | (k, l, e, d, c, h) | 354,489 | 354,978 ± 27 |
6 | (k, l, e, d, c) | 314,578 | 314,868 ± 93 |
7 | (a, b, i, g, c) | 437,811 | 438,478 ± 26 |
8 | (a, b, i, g, e) | 383,090 | 383,524 ± 26 |
9 | (k, l, e, d, c, i, g) | 386,631 | 386,950 ± 77 |
10 | (l, e, d, c, h, f, m) | 409,347 | 410,081 ± 72 |
11 | (l, e, d, c, h, f) | 366,993 | 367,285 ± 108 |
12 | (l, e, d, c, h) | 329,517 | 329,820 ± 90 |
13 | (l, e, d, c) | 289,606 | 290,003 ± 63 |
14 | (k, l, e, c) | 250,600 | 250,965 ± 55 |
15 | (k, l, e, d) | 207,791 | 207,872 ± 17 |
16 | (l, e, d) | 182,820 | 182,861 ± 49 |
17 | (e, d) | 116,180 | 116,199 ± 36 |
18 | (b, i, g) | 164,518 | 164,680 ± 9 |
19 | (i, g) | 71,985 | 72,108 ± 2 |
20 | (b, g) | 128,015 | 128,102 ± 21 |
21 | (f, h, m) | 119,740 | 119,742 ± 5 |
22 | (f, h) | 77,321 | 77,322 ± 5 |
23 | (h, m) | 82,264 | 82,268 ± 2 |
24 | (f, m) | 79,890 | 79,931 ± 23 |
25 | (k, l, e) | 143,749 | 143,819 ± 49 |
26 | (k, l) | 91,616 | 91,636 ± 7 |
27 | (l, e) | 118,777 | 118,786 ± 37 |
Calculated masses are the sum of the measured masses determined for the individual subunits by using HPLC/MS with the exception of eIF3a, which could not be measured with sufficient accuracy. The sequence mass of eIF3a was used in this case. Assignment based on mass alone was rarely possible. Tandem MS and observation of series of subcomplexes were used to limit our search and enable a unique assignment.