Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2008 Oct 6;8(12):2661–2667. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02429.x

Table 1.

Significant associations with donation decision instability for next-of-kin non-donors

Make same decision again? Fisher’s exact test,
chi square (χ2)
statistic, or t test

Donation Decision Variables Yes (n = 89) No/Unsure (n = 49)
Characteristics of the deceased
  Previous donation discussion with next-of-kin Yes 41 (77.4) 12 (22.6) p = 0.01
No 48 (56.5) 37(43.5)
  Previous donation discussion with others Yes 22 (95.7) 1 (4.3) χ2 = 15.1, p = 0.001
No 38 (52.1) 35 (47.9)
Don’t know 29 (69.0) 13 (31.0)
Next-of-kin characteristics
  Relationship to deceased Spouse 39 (66.1) 20 (33.9) χ2 = 11.0, p = 0.03
Parent 21 (84.0) 4 (16.0)
Child 15 (53.6) 13 (46.4)
Sibling 11 (68.8) 5 (31.2)
Other 3 (30.0) 7 (70.0)
  General transplant attitudes§ 9.9±2.3 11.1±1.2 t = 3.3, p = 0.001
  Adequate knowledge of brain death Yes 30 (73.2) 11 (26.8) p = 0.002
No 21 (41.2) 30 (58.8)
  Important source of organ donation information in 6 months before loved one’s death
    Discussion with family members Yes 35 (81.4) 8 (18.6) p = 0.004
No 54 (56.8) 41 (43.2)
    Public service announcement Yes 39 (81.2) 9 (18.8) p = 0.003
No 50 (55.6) 40 (44.4)
    Movies or television Yes 37 (77.1) 11 (22.9) p = 0.03
No 52 (57.8) 38 (42.2)
Requestor characteristics
  Person who 1st mentioned donation OPO person 10 (66.7) 5 (33.3) χ2 = 9.2, p = 0.01
Non-OPO person 61 (58.7) 43 (41.3)
Family member 18 (94.7) 1 (5.3)
Communication processes
  Perceived timing of donation discussion Timing was right 48 (80.0) 12 (20.0) p = 0.001
Timing was poor 41 (52.6) 37 (47.4)
  Told of death before 1st mention of donation Yes 51 (82.3) 11 (17.7) p = 0.0001
No 38 (50.0) 38 (50.0)
  Given enough time to discuss donation decision Yes 63 (73.3) 23 (26.7) p = 0.006
No 26 (50.0) 26 (50.0)
Satisfaction with healthcare team* 40.2±6.1 37.6±8.3 t = 2.1, p = 0.04

Values expressed as no. (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

For Fisher’s exact test, only p values are calculated and reported; for chi square and t tests, both the test statistic and p value are calculated and reported.

§

Measured using 4-point Likert scale. Range = 4–16, with higher scores reflecting more positive attitudes toward transplantation.

*

Measured using 4-point Likert scale. Range = 14–56, with higher score indicating more satisfaction with the health care team.