Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2008 Aug 22;8(10):2062–2070. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02361.x

Table 6.

Multivariate analysis of the primary cohort - donor, recipient and transplant center characteristics associated with donor medical complexity

Primary cohort
n=4819
Complete cohort
n=9319
Donor attribute OR C.I. p OR C.I. p
Parent 1.21 0.94-1.56 0.13 1.14 0.93-1.37 0.20
Spouse 1.29 1.06-1.56 <0.01 1.18 1.02-1.36 0.03
Low education** 1.19 1.04-1.37 0.01 1.18 1.06-1.32 <0.01
Female 0.87 0.77-0.99 0.03 0.85 0.77-0.94 <0.01
Non US citizen 0.70 0.51-0.97 0.03 0.79 0.62-1.02 0.07
Age 1.01 1.01-1.02 <0.01 1.02 1.01-1.02 <0.01
Center attribute OR C.I. p OR C.I. p
Category of
center volume
 Low Reference Reference
 Intermediate 1.20 0.95-1.52 0.13 1.04 0.86-1.26 0.69
 High 1.26 1.02-1.57 0.03 1.01 0.84-1.21 0.92
Category of
market
competitiveness
***
 Low 1.14 0.96-1.35 0.14 1.00 0.88-1.14 0.96
 Intermediate 1.06 0.91-1.23 0.48 0.95 0.84-1.07 0.39
 High Reference Reference
Proportion of
live donors/total
donors
1.97 1.23-3.16 <0.01 2.12 1.44-3.11 <0.01
6 month interval
of wait-list time
for deceased
donor kidney in
the center’s DSA
0.97 0.95-0.99 <0.01 0.97 0.95-0.99 <0.01
*

Results from multivariable logistic regression. Only hypothesized variables and those significant in the primary analysis are shown.

**

Defined as no years of college education

***

Market competitiveness as measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschmann index; the “market” here is centers performing renal transplants within a single donor service area. A high score reflects low competition; therefore, the high category is used as reference in the regression