Table 2.

Linear trend analysis for the whole-brain data, as in Figure 3

Direction of trend	Region	x	y	z	μl	F
Negative	L lateral parietal	−49	−29	26	5560	8.04*
	R lateral parietal	47	−47	30	2832	5.22*
	R posterior parietal	27	−73	28	1688	5.09*
	R insula	35	−5	−14	920	10.80**
Positive	R inferior temporal gyrus	47	−55	−8	2680	13.06**
	L thalamus	−3	−31	−2	1816	19.57**
	B cerebellum	−1	−59	−18	1728	13.01**
	R cingulate	1	−23	20	1592	5.89*
	R cerebellum	23	−39	−48	1288	13.11**
	L postcentral gyrus	−31	−37	42	1208	42.52**
	L middle frontal gyrus	−31	21	28	1104	6.47*
	R cerebellum	39	−53	−56	960	8.73*

The table lists areas where activity during learning varied (negatively or positively) as a function of the subsequent strength of item memory (confidence rating 1–6). Source memory strength was held constant at its lowest possible level by limiting the analysis to items missed on the old/new test (item confidence 1–3) and items in which the source judgment was a guess (source confidence ratings of 3 or 4). L, Left; R, right; B, bilateral. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.