Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 23;42(1):218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.181

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of the accuracy of the FFD spatial normalization approach with that of the DCT approach in a PFBT survivor with enlarged ventricles and the surgical void in the cerebellum. (A) Customized template. (B) Brain image after the affine transform using the FFD approach. (C) Brain image after the affine transform using the DCT approach. (D)–(F) FFD normalized brain images using the control point spacing distances of 20, 15 and 10 mm. (G)–(I) DCT normalized brain images using the cutoff frequencies of 1/20, 1/15 and 1/10 mm−1.