Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Jul 19;18(9):967–988. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9038-0

Table 6.

Studies evaluating egg intake.

Reference Country Age Cases/ Controls or total cohort Type of study Exposure Contrast OR (95% CI) P for trend Covariates considered*
A B E S H R
Zheng et al., 1995[29] United States 55–69 216/23,070 Cohort Eggs Q3 vs. Q1 1.3 >0.05 1 1 1 2
Shu et al., 1993 [9] China 18–74 268/268 Population- based cc Eggs >300 vs. <50 g/week 2.1 <0.01 1 1 1 1
Goodman et al., 1997 [34] United States 18–84 332/511 Population based cc Eggs >23.1 vs. <6 g/day 1.6 0.06 (A) 1 1 1
Xu et al., 2006 [37] China 30–69 1204/1212 Population- based cc Eggs >43.7 vs. <12.5 g/day 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 1 1 1 1
Levi et al., 1993 [7] Italy and Switzerland 30–75 274/572 Hospital- based cc Eggs Q3 vs. Q1 2.13 <0.01 1 1
Hirose et al., 1996[40] Japan >20 145/26,751 Hospital- based cc Eggs >3 vs. <1–2 servings/week 0.85 (0.54–1.34) 1 1 1 2
*

Adjustment columns: A = Age; B = BMI/weight; E = Total Energy; S = Smoking; H = HRT/ERT use; R = Reproductive factors; (A): matched on age. Numbers in columns refer to the number of covariates adjusted for under that grouping. Abbreviations: Q: quantile; T: tertile; cc: case-control.