Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 3;116(11):1558–1562. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11425

Table 3.

Adjusteda ORs [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] of prevalence of CAL or PD by quintiles of PCDDs, PCDFs, dioxin-like PCBs, non–dioxin-like PCBs, and OC pesticides.

Quintiles of POPsb
Indicator/compound < 20th 20th to < 40th 40th to < 60th 60th to < 80th ≥ 80th p-Trend
CAL ≥ 4 mm (presence vs. absence in any site)
PCDDs
 Cases/no. 35/248 42/250 52/248 69/249 100/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 1.0 (0.6–1.8) 1.1 (0.7–1.9) 1.3 (0.8–2.3) 1.7 (0.9–3.0) 0.04
PCDFs
 Cases/no. 36/248 45/249 50/249 75/249 92/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 1.1 (0.6–1.8) 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 1.3 (0.8–2.2) 1.3 (0.8–2.2) 0.18
Dioxin-like PCBs
 Cases/no. 16/248 46/250 54/248 80/249 102/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 1.9 (1.0–3.6) 2.0 (1.0–3.8) 2.3 (1.2–4.4) 2.3 (1.1–4.6) 0.06
Non–dioxin like PCBs
 Cases/no. 25/248 25/249 50/249 86/249 112/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 0.9 (0.5–1.8) 1.3 (0.7–2.2) 1.7 (0.9–3.1) 1.8 (0.9–3.3) 0.03
OC pesticides
 Cases/no. 17/248 30/250 53/248 86/249 112/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 1.3 (0.7–2.4) 1.7 (0.9–3.2) 2.4 (1.2–4.6) 2.7 (1.3–5.5) < 0.01
PD ≥ 4 mm (presence vs. absence in any site)
PCDDs
 Cases/no. 35/248 40/250 39/248 43/249 48/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 1.3 (0.8–2.2) 1.3 (0.8–2.2) 1.4 (0.8–2.5) 1.7 (1.0–3.1) 0.10
PCDFs
 Cases/no. 31/248 43/249 41/249 51/249 39/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 1.4 (0.9–2.4) 1.3 (0.8–2.2) 1.6 (1.0–2.7) 1.1 (0.6–2.0) 0.49
Dioxin-like PCBs
 Cases/no. 27/248 44/250 44/248 40/249 50/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 1.5 (0.9–2.6) 1.9 (1.1–3.3) 1.6 (0.9–3.1) 2.4 (1.2–4.7) 0.03
Non–dioxin like PCBs
 Cases/no. 31/248 42/249 32/249 47/249 53/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 1.4 (0.9–2.4) 1.0 (0.6–1.8) 1.6 (0.9–2.9) 1.8 (1.0–3.5) 0.08
OC pesticides
 Cases/no. 21/248 33/250 46/248 53/249 52/248
 Adjusted OR (95% CI) Referent 1.7 (0.9–3.0) 2.6 (1.4–4.8) 3.4 (1.8–6.5) 3.7 (1.8–7.6) < 0.01
a

Adjusted for age, sex, race, poverty income ratio, serum cotinine levels, cigarette smoking, and diabetes.

b

Detectable values of each POP were individually ranked, and the ranks were summed within subclass to arrive at the subclass value. All not detectable values were ranked as zero. The summary values were categorized by quintiles of the sum of ranks.