Table 1.
Study | Total TKAs | Males | Females | Male knees | Female knees | Criteria | Result | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rand and Illstrup [29], 1991 | 9200 | NNG | NNG | 3544 | 5656 | Implant survival at 10 years | M = 76%F = 83% | 0.0001 |
Robertsson et al. [33], 2000 | 24,368 | NNG | NNG | 7191 | 17,177 | Patient satisfaction at 6 years | M = 85.0%F = 84.5% | 0.001 |
Robertsson et al. [34], 2001 | 41,223 | NNG | NNG | 13,611 | 27,612 | Relative risk for revision at 10 years | M > FRelative risk = 1.5 | 0.01 |
Vazquez-Vela Johnson et al. [36], 2003 | 559 | NNG | NNG | 188 (OA) | 340 (OA) | Implant survival, OA, at 10 years | M = 95%F = 99% | 0.042 |
Rand et al. [30], 2003 | 11,606 | 3701 | 4589 | NNG | NNG | Implant survival at 10 years | M = 88%F = 93% | 0.0001 |
Ritter et al. [31], 2003 | 4724 | NNG | NNG | 1929 | 2798 | Postoperative range of motion at 3 years | Flexion: M = 1.9° > F | < 0.0001 |
Fehring et al. [12], 2004 | 1287 | 627 | 1110 | NNG | NNG | Implant failure at 5–13 years | M risk = 2.8 times > F risk | < 0.0001 |
Himanen et al. [19], 2005 | 8467 | 1586 | 5623 | 1839 | 6628 | Implant survival at 10 years | M = 93%F = 94% | 0.01 |
Roberts et al. [32], 2007 | 4606 | 1590 | 2800 | NNG | NNG | Implant survival at 15 years | M = 90%F = 94% | 0.001 |
Baker et al. [3], 2007 | 501 | 172 | 224 | NNG | NNG | Implant failure at 15 years (hazard risk) | M hazard risk = 2.48 | 0.004 |
M = male; F = female; NNG = number not given; OA = osteoarthritis.