Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 27;466(12):3059–3065. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0536-5

Table 1.

Studies of primary TKAs reporting significant male-female differences

Study Total TKAs Males Females Male knees Female knees Criteria Result p Value
Rand and Illstrup [29], 1991 9200 NNG NNG 3544 5656 Implant survival at 10 years M = 76%F = 83% 0.0001
Robertsson et al. [33], 2000 24,368 NNG NNG 7191 17,177 Patient satisfaction at 6 years M = 85.0%F = 84.5% 0.001
Robertsson et al. [34], 2001 41,223 NNG NNG 13,611 27,612 Relative risk for revision at 10 years M > FRelative risk = 1.5 0.01
Vazquez-Vela Johnson et al. [36], 2003 559 NNG NNG 188 (OA) 340 (OA) Implant survival, OA, at 10 years M = 95%F = 99% 0.042
Rand et al. [30], 2003 11,606 3701 4589 NNG NNG Implant survival at 10 years M = 88%F = 93% 0.0001
Ritter et al. [31], 2003 4724 NNG NNG 1929 2798 Postoperative range of motion at 3 years Flexion: M = 1.9° > F < 0.0001
Fehring et al. [12], 2004 1287 627 1110 NNG NNG Implant failure at 5–13 years M risk = 2.8 times > F risk < 0.0001
Himanen et al. [19], 2005 8467 1586 5623 1839 6628 Implant survival at 10 years M = 93%F = 94% 0.01
Roberts et al. [32], 2007 4606 1590 2800 NNG NNG Implant survival at 15 years M = 90%F = 94% 0.001
Baker et al. [3], 2007 501 172 224 NNG NNG Implant failure at 15 years (hazard risk) M hazard risk = 2.48 0.004

M = male; F = female; NNG = number not given; OA = osteoarthritis.