Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec;19(12):5104–5115. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-02-0224

Table 2.

Dynamisms of cytoplasmic microtubules in various klp5/6 mutants

Strain Growth rate (μm/min) Shrinkage rate (μm/min) Catastrophe frequency (events/min) Rescue frequency (events/min) Dwell timea (min) Dynamicityb (dimers/s) Total observation time (s)
Wt 2.93 ± 0.64 (n = 18) 7.86 ± 2.27 (n = 33) 0.44 0.40 1.26 ± 0.76 (n = 14) 92.1 4620
Δklp5 2.55 ± 0.58 (n = 25) 8.79 ± 3.18 (n = 38) 0.39 0.36 1.15 ± 1.00 (n = 19) 85.9 5810
Δklp6 2.92 ± 0.63 (n = 14) 7.43 ± 2.57 (n = 32) 0.41 0.34 1.91 ± 1.27 (n = 11) 80.9 4740
Δklp5 Δklp6 2.37 ± 0.50 (n = 11) 7.60 ± 2.77 (n = 30) 0.38 0.35 1.64 ± 1.60 (n = 22) 80.3 4800
klp5N + klp5N 2.64 ± 0.53 (n = 17) 5.84 ± 1.91 (n = 30) 0.30 0.27 2.14 ± 1.38 (n = 14) 71.1 6000
klp6N + klp6N 2.68 ± 0.74 (n = 20) 8.18 ± 2.31 (n = 36) 0.36 0.35 1.65 ± 1.29 (n = 19) 80.9 6000

a Duration of contact time (minutes) between microtubule end and the cell tip before catastrophe. In our measurements, microtubules in all the strains examined continue to grow at the cell end.

b Mean rate of total tubulin exchange calculated using a conversion factor of 1 μm of microtubule length = 1690 tubulin dimers.