Table 3.
SPT responses of apple cultivars relative to Golden Delicious (in %) for 4 experiments.
Cultivar | Experimenta | Average | |||
I | II | III | IV | ||
Priscilla | 30 | 30 | |||
Santana | 34 | 38 | 30 | 34 | |
Jonathan | 48 | 48 | |||
Ecolette | 39 | 62 | 51 | ||
Prima | 61 | 61 | |||
Elstar | 67 | 52 | 60 | ||
Fuji | 70 | 69 | 48 | 62 | |
Gala | 65 | 62 | 63 | ||
Elize Roblos | 67 | 67 | |||
Bellida | 72 | 72 | |||
Fiesta | 67 | 99 | 83 | ||
Delblush Tentation | 87 | 87 | |||
Pinova | 89 | 89 | |||
Golden Delicious | 100b | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
a Data for the first three experiments were derived from the original data from three experiments of Bolhaar et al. [9] on respectively cultivar screening, intra-cultivar variation and storage, of which we used only the data of patients with mild symptoms. The forth experiment came from a new cultivar screening experiment.
b The underlying HEP values for Golden Delicious for the four experiments were respectively 0.54, 0.45, 0.63 and 0.69.