Skip to main content
. 2008 May 28;275(1646):2031–2037. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0420

Table 1.

Schematic demonstrating how habitat filtering and competition affect patterns in the distribution of community members across phylogenies (black dots), species-to-genus ratios and the phylogenetic structure of communities. NRI, net relatedness index; NTI, nearest taxon index.

process habitat filtering: species share traits that allow them to exist in a particular environment random: neither process strongly effects community assembly nor multiple factors working in opposing directions competition: only species that are not too ecologically similar are able to coexist
traits conserved: if traits are convergent the patterns are similar to those shown for competition either conserved or convergent conserved: if traits are convergent the patterns are similar to those shown for random communities
distribution of community species on phylogeny graphic file with name rspb20080420if01.jpg graphic file with name rspb20080420if02.jpg graphic file with name rspb20080420if03.jpg
species : genus ratio more species per genus than expected by chance no more or less species per genus than expected by chance fewer species per genus than expected by chance
phylogenetic structure phylogenetic clustering (positive NRI and NTI scores) random phylogenetic structure (NRI and NTI scores not significantly different from zero) phylogenetic overdispersion (negative NRI and NTI scores)