Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2005 Jun 23;7(13):2571–2573. doi: 10.1021/ol050630b

Table 2.

Identification of Optimal Chiral Ligand and Proton Source for the conversion of 5a to 6a.

graphic file with name nihms63773t2.jpg

entry ligand proton sourcea yield, (SM) %b ee, %c
1 (S)-BINAP 2-Methoxyphenol 31 (49) 81
2 (S)-BINAP 2-Acetylphenol 84 (2) 77
3 (S)-BINAP Phthalimide 56 (34) 82
4 (S)-Tol-BINAP 2-Methoxyphenol 21 (39) 73
5 (S)-Tol-BINAP 2-Acetylphenol 42 (40) 77
6 (S,S)-DIOP 2-Methoxyphenol 43 (31) 36
7 (R,R)-CHIRAPHOS 2-Methoxyphenol 8 (80) nd
8 (R,S)-JOSIPHOS 2-Methoxyphenol 0 (95) -
9 (S)-MethylBOPhoz 2-Methoxyphenol 8 (87) nd
10 (S)-SYNPHOS 2-Methoxyphenol 1 (73) nd
11 (S)-SYNPHOS 2-Acetylphenol 30 (67) 71
12 (S)-SYNPHOS Phthalimide 25 (50) 70
13 (S)-DIFLUORPHOS 2-Methoxyphenol 8 (83) nd
14 (S)-DIFLUORPHOS 2-Acetylphenol 71 (15) 88
15 (S)-DIFLUORPHOS Phthalimide 91 (0) 88
a

One equivalent of the proton source was used. The reactions were carried out at 50 °C using dioxane as a solvent and 2 mol% of the chiral rhodium catalyst.

b

Isolated yields. Yields in parenthesis are for recovered starting materials.

c

Chiral HPLC analysis; nd = not determined.