Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 18;52:10.3402/fnr.v52i0.1811. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v52i0.1811

Table 2.

Design and subject characteristics of randomized controlled studies of plant sterols/stanols.

Study ID Reference Design Duration weeks n Subjects1 Sex2 Age years BMI3 kg/m2
AbuMweis et al. (2006a) (32) Crossover 4 30 Borderline high NR 59 25–29.9
AbuMweis et al. (2006b) (32) Crossover 4 30 Borderline high NR 59 25–29.9
Algorta Pineda et al. 2005 (34) Parallel 3 32 High 50–95% males 42 25–29.9
Alhassan et al. 2006 (60) Parallel 5 26 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 53Tx 52Co 25–29.9
Andersson et al. 1999 (13) Parallel 8 40 High 5–50% males 55 25–29.9
Ayesh et al. 1999 (61) Parallel 3 & 4 21 Optimal 5–50% males 36 <24.9
Cater et al. (2005a) (62) Crossover 6 8 NR 50–95% males 58 25–29.9
Cater et al. (2005b) (62) Crossover 6 8 NR 50–95% males 58 25–29.9
Cater et al. (2005c) (62) Crossover 6 8 NR 50–95% males 58 25–29.9
Cater et al. (2005d) (62) Crossover 8 10 Near or above optimal >95% males 66 25–29.9
Christiansen et al. (2001a) (63) Parallel 26 92 High NR 51 <24.9
Christiansen et al. (2001b) (63) Parallel 26 89 High NR 51 25–29.9
Cleghorn et al. 2003 (64) Crossover 4 50 Borderline high 5–50% males 47 25–29.9
Davidson et al. (2001a) (28) Parallel 8 42 Borderline high 50–95% males; 46 NR
Davidson et al. (2001b) (28) Parallel 8 40 Borderline high 50–95% males; 46 NR
Davidson et al. (2001c) (28) Parallel 8 44 Borderline high 50–95% males; 46 NR
De Graaf et al. 2002 (47) Parallel 4 62 High 50–95% males; 56 Tx 58 Co 25–29.9
Deavarj et al. 2006 (22) Parallel 8 72 Borderline high 5–50% males 44 Tx 48 Co <24.9
Devaraj et al. (2004) (23) Parallel 8 72 borderline high 5–50% males 41 Tx 44 Co 25–29.9
Doornbos et al. (2006a) (19) Parallel 4 72 Borderline high 5–50% males 57 25–29.9
Doornbos et al. (2006b) (19) Parallel 4 71 Borderline high 5–50% males 57 25–29.9
Doornbos et al. (2006c) (19) Parallel 4 69 Borderline high 5–50% males 57 25–29.9
Doornbos et al. (2006d) (19) Parallel 4 71 Borderline high 5–50% males 57 25–29.9
Gylling et al. (1994) (65) Crossover 6 11 NR >95% males 58 25–29.9
Gylling et al. 1999 (66) Crossover 5 21 Borderline high <5% males 53 25–29.9
Hallikainen et al. (1999a) (10) Parallel 8 37 High 5–50% males 41 Tx 46 Co <24.9 Tx 25–29.9 Co
Hallikainen et al. (1999b) (10) Parallel 8 35 High 5–50% males 43 Tx 46 Co 25–29.9
Hallikainen et al. (2000a) (67) Crossover 4 34 High NR 49 <24.9
Hallikainen et al. (2000b) (67) Crossover 4 34 High NR 49 <24.9
Hendriks et al. (1999a) (12) Crossover 3.5 80 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 37 <24.9
Hendriks et al. (1999b) (12) Crossover 3.5 80 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 37 <24.9
Hendriks et al. (1999c) (12) Crossover 3.5 80 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 37 <24.9
Hendriks et al. 2003 (68) Parallel 52 185 Borderline high 5–50% males 48 <24.9
Hyun et al. 2005 (18) Parallel 4 51 Near or above optimal 50–95% males; 29 <24.9
Jakulj et al. 2005 (69) Crossover 4 39 Very high 50–95% males; 56 25–29.9
Jones et al. 1999 (54) Parallel 4.3 32 High & very high >95% males NR NR
Jones et al. (2000a) (50) Crossover 3 15 High >95% males NR NR
Jones et al. (2000b) (50) Crossover 3 15 High >95% males NR NR
Jones et al. (2003a) (27) Crossover 3 15 Borderline high 50–95% males NR NR
Jones et al. (2003b) (27) Crossover 3 15 Borderline high 50–95% males NR NR
Judd et al. 2002 (70) Crossover 3 53 Borderline high 5–50% males 47 25–29.9
Jauhianen et al. 2006 (49) Parallel 5 67 Borderline high 5–50% males 43 NR
Lau et al. (2005a) (71) Crossover 3 15 Borderline high 5–50% males 55 25–29.9
Lau et al. (2005b) (71) Crossover 3 14 Borderline high 5–50% males 55 30–34.9
Lee et al. 2003 (72) Parallel 12 81 High 5–50% males 60 TX 62 Co 25–29.9
Lottenberg et al. 2003 (73) Crossover 4 60 Very high 5–50% males NR NR
Maki et al. (2001a) (37) Parallel 5 158 Borderline high 5–50% males 59 Tx 58 Co 25–29.9
Maki et al. (2001b) (37) Parallel 5 118 Borderline high 5–50% males 60 Tx 58 Co 25–29.9
Matvienko et al. (2002) (33) Parallel 4 34 Borderline high >95% males 22 Tx 22 Co 25–29.9
Mensink et al. (2002) (20) Parallel 4 60 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 36 <24.9
Miettinen and Vanhanen (1994a) (45) Parallel 9 17 NR 50–95% males 45 25–29.9
Miettinen and Vanhanen (1994b) (45) Parallel 9 15 NR 50–95% males 45 25–29.9
Miettinen and Vanhanen (1994c) (45) Parallel 9 15 NR 50–95% males 45 25–29.9
Mussner et al. (2002) (35) Crossover 3 63 Borderline high 5–50% males 42 <24.9
Naumann et al. (2003a) (36) Crossover 3 42 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 32 w 37 m <24.9
Crossover
Naumann et al. (2003b) (36) Crossover 3 42 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 32 w 37 m <24.9
Neil et al. 2001 (74) Crossover 8 29 Very high 5–50% males 53 Tx 50 Co 25–29.9
Nguyen et al. (1999a) (75) Parallel 8 159 Borderline high 5–50% males 53 25–29.9
Nguyen et al. (1999b) (75) Parallel 8 157 Borderline high 5–50% males 53 25–29.9
Nguyen et al. (1999c) (75) Parallel 8 162 Borderline high 5–50% males 53 25–29.9
Nigon et al. 2001 (76) Crossover 8 53 Borderline high & high 5–50% males 58 <24.9
Noakes et al. (2002a) (77) Crossover 3 46 High 5–50% males 58 w 55 m 25–29.9
Noakes et al. (2002b) (77) Crossover 3 46 High 5–50% males 58 w 55 m 25–29.9
Noakes et al. (2002c) (77) Crossover 3 35 High 50–95% males 56 w 58 m 25–29.9
Noakes et al. (2005a) (16) Crossover 3 40 High 5–50% males 60 25–29.9
Noakes et al. (2005b) (16) Crossover 3 40 High 5–50% males 60 25–29.9
Ntanios et al. 2002 (38) Crossover 3 53 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 45 <24.9
Plat and Mensink et al. (2000a) (78) Parallel 8 78 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 33 <24.9
Plat and Mensink et al. (2000b) (78) Parallel 8 76 Near or above optimal 5–50% males 33 <24.9
Plat et al. (2000a) (31) Crossover 4 39 Optimal 5–50% males 31 <24.9
Plat et al. (2000b) (31) Crossover 4 39 Optimal 5–50% males 31 <24.9
Polagruto et al. 2006 (48) Parallel 6 67 High 5–50% males 49 Tx 56 Co 25–29.9
Quilez et al. 2003 (21) Parallel 8 57 Optimal 5–50% males 31 <24.9
Saito et al. (2006a) (79) Parallel 4 33 Borderline high >95% males 38 Tx 39 Co <24.9
Saito et al. (2006b) (79) Parallel 4 33 Borderline high >95% males 39 <24.9
Saito et al. (2006c) (79) Parallel 4 34 Borderline high >95% males 38 Tx 39 Co <24.9
Seki et al. (2003) (43) Parallel 12 60 Borderline high >95% males 39 <24.9
Sierksma et al. 1999 (80) Crossover 3 75 NR 50–95% males 44 <24.9
Simons et al. 2002 (42) Parallel 4 77 Very high 50–95% males 58 Tx 60 Co 25–29.9
Spilburg et al. 2003 (26) Parallel 4 24 Borderline high 50–95% males 51 25–29.9
Temme et al. 2002 (81) Crossover 4 42 High 50–95% males 55 25–29.9
Thomsen et al. (2004a) (15) Crossover 4 69 High 5–50% males 60 25–29.9
Thomsen et al. (2004b) (15) Crossover 4 69 High 5–50% males 60 25–29.9
Vanhanen et al. 1993 (82) Parallel 6 67 Borderline high 50–95% males 48 Tx 43 Co 25–29.9
Vanhanen et al. 1994 (83) Parallel 6 14 Borderline high 5–50% males 55 25–29.9
Vanstone et al. (2002a) (51) Crossover 3 15 High 50–95% males 48 30–34.9
Vanstone et al. (2002b) (51) Crossover 3 15 High 50–95% males 48 30–34.9
Vanstone et al. (2002c) (51) Crossover 3 15 High 50–95% males 48 30–34.9
Vissers et al. 2000 (84) Crossover 3 60 NR 5–50% males NR NR
Volpe et al. 2001 (17) Crossover 4 30 High 50–95% males NR <24.9
Weststrate et al. (1998a) (8) Crossover 3.5 95 Borderline high 50% males 45 <24.9
Weststrate et al. (1998b) (8) Crossover 3.5 95 Borderline high 50% males 45 < 24.9
Yoshida et al. (2006a) (24) Crossover 3 16 High 5–50% males 55 25–29.9
Yoshida et al. (2006b) (24) Crossover 3 13 Borderline high 5–50% males 57 30–34.9

NR = not reported, NC = Not clear, Tx = treatment; Co = control; w = women; m = men.

1Subjects were classified according to total or cholesterol baseline levels reported in baseline characteristic. Classification based on ATPIII (85).

2Predominant sex.

3Body Mass Index.