Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 12;275(1634):473–481. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1460

Table 1.

General comparison of acoustic characteristics. (Average acoustic measures of the vocalizations used in the neuroimaging experiments. RMS, mean energy (arb. units); DUR, duration (seconds); MEDf0, medial fundamental frequency of phonation (f0, Hz); SDf0, standard deviation off0 (Hz); MINf0; minimum of f0 (Hz); MAXf0, maximum of f0 (Hz); % UNV, percentage of unvoiced frames; HNR, harmonic-to-noise ratio (dB).)

RMS DURa,b MEDf0a,b SDf0a MINf0a,b MAXf0a % UNVc HNR
animal positive 0.235 0.713 726.5 339.7 369.7 1612.8 4.40 8.12
s.d. 0.053 0.394 475.2 485.4 218.4 1695.5 10.00 5.15
animal negative 0.212 0.983 1673.7 547.2 808.7 2940.0 21.99 10.19
s.d. 0.089 0.388 1347.7 573.3 777.2 2524.3 29.116 6.128
human positive 0.181 1.357 441.8 138.2 278.5 824.1 36.43 8.32
s.d. 0.056 0.481 390.6 218.2 310.3 795.5 23.00 4.80
human negative 0.216 1.485 594.3 107.8 337.9 793.7 16.48 10.12
s.d. 0.095 0.441 553.2 106.8 384.3 585.9 23.9 5.87
a

Significant (p<0.05 Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons) main effect of animal/human.

b

Significant main effect of positive/negative.

c

Significant interaction between animal/human and positive/negative.