Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Jul 7;173(1):153–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.05.019

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Current distance relationships estimated using the refractory interaction technique with threshold stimulation intensities. A. Current distance constants estimated using different interelectrode distances (mean ± s.d. across three randomized populations). B. Current-distance curves estimated using only data from the 300 µm interelectrode distance to estimate k (dot), using data from 100, 200, and 300 µm interelectrode distances to estimate both I0 and k (dash), or using data from only the 200 and 300 µm interelectrode distances to estimate both I0 and k (dash-dot), and the optimal CDR obtained from the lower boundary (bold).