Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2008 Jan 17;12(4):397–412. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2007.12.005

Table 2.

The mean MLE scores for synthetic data using four tracking techniques over 50 frames. Normalized MLE scores (0–100) were calculated every 25 frames according to Equation (10): 0 for the perfect match to 100 for the worst. The best results are shown in italic. Results are comparable to those in Table 1 for in-vivo data.

Mean/Std conserr Mean/Std abserr
Frames 1–25 Frames 26–50 Frames 1–25 Frames 26–50
Block Matching 2.12±0.19 3.29±0.49 6.91±5.28 7.94±5.06
Optical Flow 3.96±1.24 4.12±1.64 7.07±5.12 7.02±3.74
Block Matching - Optical Flow 5.64±2.60 6.03±3.43 7.18±4.96 8.39±4.23
Block Flow 2.53±0.11 2.52± 0.12 2.84±0.21 2.87±0.15