Table 4.
Preoperative leakage during reduction testing | Postoperative | SUI | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Na | % | % | % | % | % | ||
All methods | Leakage | 22/60 | 37 | 33 | 83 | 37 | 80 |
No leakage | 45/227 | 20 | |||||
Pessary | Leakage | 1/3 | 33 | 11 | 94 | 33 | 78 |
No leakage | 8/37 | 22 | |||||
Manual | Leakage | 5/11 | 45 | 28 | 86 | 45 | 74 |
No leakage | 13/50 | 26 | |||||
Swab | Leakage | 5/18 | 28 | 29 | 80 | 28 | 81 |
No leakage | 12/63 | 19 | |||||
Forceps | Leakage | 3/13 | 23 | 38 | 76 | 23 | 86 |
No leakage | 5/36 | 14 | |||||
Speculum | Leakage | 8/15 | 53 | 53 | 83 | 53 | 83 |
No leakage | 7/41 | 17 |
PPV Positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value
There were two attempts at prolapse reduction stress testing per subject.