Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jan 9;19(5):607–614. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0498-2

Table 4.

Postoperative rates of stress urinary incontinence in Burch group by leakage and reduction method at 300-ml bladder volume

Preoperative leakage during reduction testing Postoperative SUI Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Na % % % % %
All methods Leakage 22/60 37 33 83 37 80
No leakage 45/227 20
Pessary Leakage 1/3 33 11 94 33 78
No leakage 8/37 22
Manual Leakage 5/11 45 28 86 45 74
No leakage 13/50 26
Swab Leakage 5/18 28 29 80 28 81
No leakage 12/63 19
Forceps Leakage 3/13 23 38 76 23 86
No leakage 5/36 14
Speculum Leakage 8/15 53 53 83 53 83
No leakage 7/41 17

PPV Positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value

a

There were two attempts at prolapse reduction stress testing per subject.