Table E1.
Overview of the global analyses in Experiment 5
go RT
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
training phase (blocks 1–8) | test phase (blocks 9–10) | |||||||
df | F | MSe | η p2 | df | F | MSe | η p2 | |
Block (B) | 7,133 | 15.9** | 2,874 | .46 | 1,19 | 3.5 | 2246 | .16 |
Stimulus Type (ST) | 2,38 | 1.4 | 1,094 | .07 | 2,38 | 7.0** | 1664 | .27 |
B x ST | 14, 266 | 2.0* | 965 | .10 | 2,38 | 1.1 | 1276 | .05 |
p(respond|signal) as a function of block
|
||||||||
training phase (blocks 1–8) | test phase (blocks 9–10) | |||||||
|
||||||||
df | F | MSe | η p2 | df | F | MSe | η p2 | |
|
||||||||
Block (B) | 7,133 | 0.6 | 0.01 | .03 | 1,19 | 0.02 | 0.01 | .001 |
Stimulus Type (ST) | 1,19 | 5.2* | 0.01 | .21 | 1,19 | 0.03 | 0.01 | .002 |
B x ST | 7,133 | 0.9 | 0.01 | .05 | 1,19 | 0.02 | 0.01 | .001 |
p(respond|signal) as a function of SSD
|
||||||||
training phase (blocks 1–8) | test phase (blocks 9–10) | |||||||
|
||||||||
df | F | MSe | η p2 | df | F | MSe | η p2 | |
|
||||||||
Stimulus Type (ST) | 1,19 | 5.1 | 0.01 | .21 | ||||
SSD | 4,76 | 137.8 | 0.02 | .88 | ||||
ST x SSD | 4,76 | 1.7 | 0.01 | .08 | ||||
go error rates
|
||||||||
training phase (blocks 1–8) | test phase (blocks 9–10) | |||||||
|
||||||||
df | F | MSe | η p2 | df | F | MSe | η p2 | |
|
||||||||
Block (B) | 7,133 | 1.3 | 17 | .06 | 1,19 | 3.5† | 18 | .16 |
Stimulus Type (ST) | 2,38 | 1.7 | 45 | .08 | 2,38 | 2.4 | 28 | .11 |
B x ST | 14, 266 | 1.5 | 16 | .07 | 2,38 | 1.1 | 19 | .05 |
Note: p <.01;
p <.05;
p =.07