Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomol NMR. 2008 Sep 12;42(2):99–109. doi: 10.1007/s10858-008-9267-x

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Agreement between experimental RDCs and tRNAVal models. RDCPf1 (A), or RDCMSA (B) vs stage 1 model, generated without SAXS or RDC input data. (C) RDCPf1 vs refined (stage 2) model; (D) RDCMSA vs refined model. In all cases, filled symbols represent RDCs included when carrying out the SVD fit between the experimental data and the structure; open symbols are (A,B) jack-knifed RDC values, predicted from the alignment tensor when that particular RDC was not included in the SVD fit, and (C) cross-validated RDC values, predicted for the refined model calculated without that particular RDC.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure