Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2008;3(9):1422–1434. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.138

TABLE 1.

Hemodynamic parameters and indices of systolic and diastolic function derived from PV relations in mice and rats.

Mouse1 Mouse2
Rat2 Rat2
Anesthesia used Urethane + etomidate
+ morphine
Isoflurane Ketamine
+ xylazine
Pentobarbital
sodium
Isoflurane PB
Parameter
  BW (g) 20–30  20–34   20–34 20–34 250–500 300–450
  HR (min−1) 490–655  470–620 340–510   365–550 370–420 350–440
  MAP (mm Hg)   81–105 93–109 72–90 100–124   93–120
  ESP (mm Hg) 80–120   92–118 104–125 90–110 119–146 113–142
  EDP (mm Hg) 2–8  1–6 1–9 2–8   0.5–8    1–7
  ESV (μl) 2–12   7–21   9–20 10–29 21–141   36–160
  EDV (μl) 20–33  25–53 25–39   28–54 161–303 170–266
  SV (μl) 14–26  17–30 14–21   17–25 103–191 101–154
  CO (ml min−1)   7–16 8–16 6–10   6–13 49–70 42–62
  CI (ml min−1 × kg) 280–557  350–580 225–400   226–480 114–227 110–172
  Ea (mm Hg μl−1) 4–6  3–7 5–9   4–6 0.5–1.1 0.5–1.1
  TPR (mm Hg μl−1 × min) 6–12 10–19     7–14 1.5–2.5 1.9–2.5
Systolic indices
  EF (%) 50–88  55–72 49–63   44–62 49–89 42–87
  dP/dtmax (mm Hg s−1) 9,500–16,000   8,200–14,200 7,700–14,480 6,900–11,000 8,900–13,100 7,600–11,500
  SW (mm Hg × ml) 1,200–2,700  1,500–2,600 1,600–2,200   1,100–2,100 13,500–22,900 12,800–21,000
  Ees(Emax)(mm Hg μl−1) 6–14   7–14 6–9 2–7 1–4
  dP/dtmax−EDV (mm Hg s−1 ml−1) 360–600  180–470 160–390 40–120 28–90
  PRSW (mm Hg) 70–130 58–93 51–86 50–170   50–140
  Efficiency (%) 70–85  60–75 55–68 60–90   50–80
Diastolic indices
  −dP/dtmin (mm Hg s−1) 6,000–12,000   6,700–10,500 6,900–10,400 5,400–9,500 5,900–11,900 5,970–9,970
  Tau (W) (ms) 4.4–7.6 4.8–8.5   4.9–10   7–9.6   7–9.9
  Tau (G) (ms) 7–9   7–12 8–13  7–15 10–13 10–13
  EDPVR 0.04–0.12 0.06–0.2 0.01–0.04 0.01–0.04

BW, body weight; CI, cardiac index, CO/BW; CO, cardiac output; dP/dt−EDV, dP/dtmax−end diastolic volume relation; dP/dtmax, peak rate of pressure rise; −dP/dtmin, peak rate of pressure decline; Ea, arterial elastance (measure of ventricular afterload); EDP, end-diastolic pressure; EDPVR slope, end-diastolic PV relation slope; EDV, end-diastolic volume; Ees/max, end-systolic elastance (slope of the end-systolic relationship); EF, ejection fraction; Efficiency (SW/PV area); ESP, end-systolic pressure; ESV, end-systolic volume; HR, heart rate; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PRSW, preload recruited stroke work (slope of stroke work−EDV relationship); SV, stroke volume; SW, stroke work; Tau (G), relaxation time constant calculated by Glantz method (regression of dP/dt versus pressure); Tau (W), relaxation time constant calculated by Weiss method (regression of log(pressure)); TPR, total peripheral resistance, MAP/CO. The given wide ranges of variables were derived from various control mouse and rat strains and represent large number of experiments over the past 5 years.

1

Values were calculated with correction based on aortic flow measurements and saline calibrations as described from PV loops obtained with open-chest approach6-10.

2

Values were calculated with PVAN3.3–3.5 (Millar Instruments) on the basis of internal RVU calibrations of the system followed by corrections of cuvette and saline calibrations11,13-20 from PV loops obtained with closed-chest approach. For additional useful indices, see also ref. 8.