Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38(10):877–893. doi: 10.1080/10408440802273164

Table 1.

Main differences between three major prospective studies of methylmercury-exposed children

Attribute New Zealand Faroes Seychelles
Source of exposure Shark and ocean fish Whale, ocean fish and shellfish Ocean fish
Mercury exposure assessment Maternal hair Cord blood, cord tissue, and maternal hair Maternal hair
Mercury effect Significant Significant Not significant
Effect of maternal fish intake Mothers were matched for high fish intake Adjustment for maternal fish intake increased mercury effect Maternal fish intake not included in data analysis
Other toxicant exposures Lead in house paint and air PCBs (whale blubber) Tropical pesticide use
Language English (and Pacific languages) Faroese (and Danish) Creole (English and French)
Socioeconomic setting Industrialized Western Industrialized Scandinavian Middle-income developing
Family-setting Urban, mixed cultures Traditional Mainly matriarchal
Outcome tests Omnibus Domain-related and neurophysiological Omnibus and domain -related
Clinical examiners Clinical specialists Clinical specialists Nurse/student