Table 3 Time trends in sexual behaviour and STI/HIV prevalence among male clients of female sex workers: Abomey‐Bohicon, Parakou and Porto‐Novo, 2002–2005.
Abomey‐Bohicon. Parakou. Porto‐Novo | 2002 | 2005 | p value* |
---|---|---|---|
Commercial sex partners | (n = 297)† | (n = 343)† | |
Frequency visit FSW/year: mean (median) | 10.8 (7) | 14.8 (8) | <0.001* |
Condom used last sex act with FSW | 49.0% | 95.9% | <0.001 |
Consistent condom use with FSW | 41.8% | 79.4% | <0.001 |
Non‐commercial sex partners | |||
Is married or has a regular girlfriend | 86.5%‡ | 70.8%§ | NC |
Consistent condom use with regular partner | 22.5% | 19.9% | 0.76 |
Has casual (non‐FSW) sex partners | 34.1%‡ | 26.6%§ | NC |
Condom used in last sex act with casual partner | 41.5% | 68.2% | <0.001 |
Consistent condom use with casual partners | 26.6% | 52.3% | <0.001 |
HIV/STI prevalence | (n = 311)† | (n = 341)† | |
HIV | 4.0% | 3.2% | 0.75 |
Neisseria gonorrhoeae | 3.5% | 0.59% | 0.03 |
Chlamydia trachomatis | 4.8% | 1.8% | 0.047 |
p value: chi square test; *Student t test. †total sample size for each round: denominators for specific variables vary due to incomplete data, as in some cases men left before the interview was finished or chose not to answer specific questions. Denominators for biological assays are higher than those for interview, since some men gave a a urine sample before having sex with an FSW, and then left after having had sex, having decided not to give an interview; ‡had sex with in last year; §had sex with in last 3 months.
NC, variables not directly comparable (significance testing not carried out)