Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2008 Mar 25;46(10):2580–2592. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.012

Table 2.

Good and poor readers’ performance on the experimental task: Mean accuracy and response times

Phase 1 (Pre-remediation) Phase 2 (Post-remediation) Phase 3 (Follow-up)
Active Passive Active Passive Active Passive
Group Sen Non Sen Non Sen Non Sen Non Sen Non Sen Non
Accuracy (Percentage Correct)
M 98% 100% 97% 98% 99% 98% 92% 98% 99% 100% 97% 99%
Good Readers SD 4% 0% 7% 4% 3% 4% 9% 5% 3% 0% 5% 3%
M 94% 97% 92% 91% 92% 96% 92% 96% 97% 99% 92% 99%
Poor Readers SD 9% 11% 9% 20% 10% 9% 8% 8% 6% 3% 9% 2%

Reaction Time(ms)
M 2876 3014 3514 3233 2870 2722 3294 2997 2499 2482 2865 2766
Good Readers SD 552 585 845 611 547 464 643 602 378 568 518 488
M 3840 3931 4578 4486 3785 3921 4422 4396 3129 3220 3787 3569
Poor Readers SD 950 820 1043 1064 1121 1345 1222 1256 732 857 960 803