Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2008 Aug 15;181(4):2741–2752. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.4.2741

Table I.

Treatment with anti-TGF-β and anti-IL-4 mAbs weakens therapeutic potential of Salmonella-CFA/1 induced CD4+ T cells. a

Treatment b CIA/Total c Day Onset d Max. Score e Average score f CS g
PBS 10/10 27.8 ± 1.6 10 7.2 ± 0.78 50.4 ± 7.11
H696CD4+ T cells and IgG 4/10 33 ± 5.35 4 1.44 ± 0.65* 7.78 ± 4.65*
H696CD4+ T cells and anti-IL-4 8/8 26.71 ± 2.29 8 3.62 ± 0.96 34.87 ± 11.09
H696CD4+ T cells and anti-TGF-β 8/8 27.25 ± 2.43 12 5.75 ± 0.86 49.37 ± 10.13
a

Arthritis was induced in DBA/1 mice with 100 μg bovine CII in complete Freund’s adjuvant on day 0.

b

Salmonella-CFA/1 primed CD4+ T cells were adoptively transferred to mice with induced arthritis on day 15. Intra-peritoneal mAb treatments were initiated on day of transfer, then weekly for a total of four doses (1 mg total of mAb/mouse).

c

Number of mice with CIA /total in a group for 43 days after CII challenge.

d

Mean day ± SEM of first symptoms onset in diseased mice only.

e

Maximum score in group in entire observation period.

f

Average clinical score per group on day 43 post-induction (end of observation period) calculated as sum of individual scores divided by the number of mice in group ± SEM.

*

P < 0.005 as compared to PBS group;

P < 0.05 as compared to anti-IL-4 or anti-TGF-β mAb treated group.

g

Cumulative scores (CS) calculated as all scores during the period of observation divided by number of mice in each group.

*

P < 0.005 as compared to PBS and anti-TGF-β treated groups;

P < 0.05 as compared to anti-IL-4 treated group.