Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Econ Hist. 2007 Dec;67(4):1001–1035. doi: 10.1017/S0022050707000472

APPENDIX TABLE 3.

OLS REGRESSIONS: CORRELATES BETWEEN ESTIMATED MALARIA RISK AND REPORTED MALARIA MORTALITY IN 1880, 1890, AND 1920 (dependent variable: In(malaria mortality per 1,000 population))

1880 1890 1920
(mean = −1.2049)
(mean = −1.2967)
(mean = −3.1264)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
County Characteristics Mean Estimate t-value Estimate t-value Mean Estimate t-value Mean Estimate t-value
Estimated malaria risk 0.2861 6.918 23.67 6.245 16.12 0.2744 2.4939 8.15 0.2744 0.8596 3.14
Value of all farm output per capita 60.25 −0.0046 −3.42 52.72 −0.009 −8.19 14.22 −0.0003 −0.14
Value of manufacturing output per capita 39.11 −0.0027 −4.03 50.04 −0.0026 −7.31 0.22 −1.3452 −17.04
Proportion of white populations 0.8579 −0.1399 −0.72 0.8683 −1.8892 −12.35 0.8863 −3.0024 −17.52
Constant term −3.1845 −35.46 −2.4895 −9.43 0.1488 0.69 −0.4191 −2.02
F (p-value) 560.50 (0.0000) 149.88 (0.0000) 190.64 (0.0000) 270.21 (0.0000)
Adjusted R2 0.3906 0.4055 0.4311 0.4788
n 874 874 1,002 1,173

Note: For 1920, I used the value of all farm property as a measure of value of all farm output, and the value of products of manufacturing establishments to obtain the value of manufacturing output per capita.