Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1435–1452. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1435

Table 1. Consistent fMRI results across subjects.

Anatomical location H Z-stat MNI(x,y,z)
A. Main effect of feature change: Feat.diff - Feat.rep
LOS R 4.15 39 -90 0
3.07 45 -75 9
L 2.76£ -42 -60 3
FFG R 2.63£ 42 -54 -21
Amyg R 3.22 30 -9 -21
L 3.47 -30 -6 -27
B. Main effect of second-order configural relations change: 2nd.diff > 2nd.rep
IPS R 4.15 48 -39 36
C. Correlation of behaviour and fMRI, second-order configural relations:
IOG R 4.31 33 -87 -18
L 3.85 -45 -75 -12
2.80£ -45 -81 -6
FFG R 2.93£ 42 -57 -21
2.66£ 45 -54 -21
IFG L 4.54 -33 36 24
SFG R 4.11 18 63 12
L 3.47 -18 18 42
CG 3.57 -3 -9 36
IFG/insula R 3.75 33 33 -12
Putamen L 3.39 -24 -3 9

Abbreviations: LOS, lateral occipital sulcus; FFG, posterior fusiform gyrus; OFC, orbital frontal cortex; aSTS, anterior superior temporal sulcus; MTS, middle temporal sulcus; Amyg, amygdala; CG, cingulated gyrus; aHipp, anterior hippocampus; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyurs; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; CG, cingulated gyrus; H, hemisphere; L, left, R, right. ☺ peak that overlap with face preferntial voxels across subjects (tested using inclusive mask P < 0.05, uncorrected). Statitical significnace of peak activation, two-tailed tests: all Z > 2.98, P ≤ 0.002, aside from £P < 0.008..