Table 2.
Results from ANOVA evaluating effects of mating system, experimental design, and geographical distribution on (1) log-transformed combined gene flow estimates (top values: F̃ST; see footnote to Table 1) and (2) log-transformed estimates of number of migrants (bottom values: Nem) in plants and animals. The interaction effect was excluded from the animal study due to lost degrees of freedom
| Plants
|
Animals
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source of variation | d.f. | F | P | d.f. | F | P |
| Mating system* | 3, 117 | 4.69 | 0.0039 | 3, 233 | 2.37 | 0.072 |
| 3, 117 | 4.57 | 0.0046 | 3, 235 | 3.71 | 0.012 | |
| Portion of range sampled† | 3, 117 | 4.22 | 0.0071 | 3, 233 | 18.72 | 0.0001 |
| 3, 117 | 3.62 | 0.0152 | 3, 235 | 19.87 | 0.0001 | |
| Geographical distribution‡ | 2, 117 | 1.06 | 0.35 | 2, 233 | 2.66 | 0.072 |
| 2, 117 | 2.09 | 0.13 | 2, 235 | 2.68 | 0.071 | |
| Mating system × geographical distribution | 6, 117 | 0.27 | 0.95 | NA | NA | NA |
| 6, 117 | 0.62 | 0.71 | NA | NA | NA | |
| Nucleotides or allozymes | 1, 117 | 1.34 | 0.25 | 1, 233 | 0.0002 | 0.99 |
| 1, 117 | 0.80 | 0.37 | 1, 235 | 0.37 | 0.54 | |
*
Outcrossing, selfing and clonal, mixed mating and unknown.
†
Local, regional, biregional and species-wide.
‡
Endemic, regional or widespread.