Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol. 2008 May 16;42(5):407–416. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2008.03.130

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effects of line [high-alcohol-drinking (HAD)-1 (n = 39, top panel) vs. HAD-2 (n = 40, middle panel) vs. P (n = 39, bottom panel)], sex-of-animal [male (n = 58 vs. female (n = 60)] and ethanol condition [continuous access (n = 61) vs. periodic access (n = 57)] on body weight [g, mean (± S.E.M.)] averaged across 4-day blocks. For ease of presentation, symbols are absent. In general, P rats weighed more than HAD rats, male rats weighed more than female rats, and, except for differences between the repeatedly deprived and continuous access male HAD rats, there were no differences between ethanol condition. Because of the differences noted, all individual intake measures (daily ethanol, water, and total fluids) were corrected for the animals’ respective body weight.