Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 11.
Published in final edited form as: Organometallics. 2006 Sep 25;25(20):4731–4733. doi: 10.1021/om0606791

Table 3.

Substrate scope under optimized conditions.

entry product mol% cat.a temp (°C)/time (h) % yield (% ee)
1 graphic file with name nihms61266t1.jpg 2 20 115/24 95(80)c
10 115/48 91(80)c
2 graphic file with name nihms61266t2.jpg 14 20b 85/24 99(51)c
10b 85/48 91(51)c
3 graphic file with name nihms61266t3.jpg 15 20 135/72 33(62)c,d
4 graphic file with name nihms61266t4.jpg 16 10 135/24 79(33)c
5 graphic file with name nihms61266t5.jpg 17 20 135/24 93(62)c
6 graphic file with name nihms61266t6.jpg 18 20 115/48 93(70)c
20 115/48 85(70)e
7 graphic file with name nihms61266t7.jpg 19 10 115/48 78(80)f
8 graphic file with name nihms61266t8.jpg 20 20 135/24 75(55)f

Reactions were performed in toluene.

a

Prepared in situ by combination of equimolar amounts of ligand and Zr(NMe2)4 in toluene and heating at the reaction temp for 15 min prior to introduction of substrate.

b

Ligand and Zr(NMe2)4 pre-heated at 105 °C for 15 min.

c

GC yield determined using C6Me6 as an internal standard; ee determined by chiral GC.

d

32% starting material remained in solution at the end of the reaction.

e

Isolated yield; ee determined by chiral GC.

f

Isolated yield as 2-napthoyl amide; ee determined by chiral HPLC.