Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 15;183(6):1075–1088. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200806035

Table II. List of mutants revealed by a genome-wide screen that are affected in MCC formation.

Name ORF Main biological
process
Cellular
compartment
Strength of phenotype
HUP1 Can1 Sur7 Filipin
Level I
ERG2 YMR202W Ergosterol biosynthesis ERc +++ +++ ++ ++
ERG24 YNL280C Ergosterol biosynthesis ERa +++ +++ + ++
ERG6 YML008C Ergosterol biosynthesis ERa +++ ++ + ++
NCE102 YPR149W Nonclassical protein secretion Plasma membraned +++ +++ ++ +
OCH1 YGL038C N-glycosylation Golgia +++ +++ + +
PIL1 YGR086C Endocytosis (eisosome) Cytoplasm–plasma
membrane associatedb
+++ +++ ++ ++
Level II
COG1 YGL223C Intra-Golgi vesicle-mediated transport Golgia ++ +++ +
GOS1 YHL031C Intra-Golgi vesicle-mediated transport Golgib ++ + +
OPI3 YJR073C Phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis ERa ++ +++ +
RVS161 YCR009C Polarization of the actin cytoskeleton,
endocytosis, and cell polarity
Cytoplasm–plasma
membrane associatedb
++ ++ +
SUR4 YLR372W Sphingolipid biosynthesis ERa +++ +++ +
TAF14 YPL129W RNA polymerase II transcription
initiation and chromatin modification
Nucleusa + + +
VPS52 YDR484W Retrograde transport and
endosome to Golgi
Golgia +++ ++ +
VPS54 YDR027C Retrograde transport and
endosome to Golgi
Golgia +++ +++ +
Level III
CAX4 YGR036C N-glycosylation ERa +++ ++
ELP6 YMR312W Regulation of transcription Nucleusc + +
ERG5 YMR015C Ergosterol biosynthesis ERa +++ +++
FYV6 YNL133C Unknown Nucleusa +++ +
HNT3 YOR154W Unknown Cytoplasma +++ +++
MNN10 YDR245W N-glycosylation Golgia ++
MNN11 YER001W N-glycosylation Golgia + +
NOT3 YIL038C Regulation of transcription Cytoplasma + +
PEP12 YOR036W Golgi to vacuole transport Golgib +++ +++
PEP7 YDR323C Golgi to vacuole transport Endosomea +++ ++
PER1 YCR044C GPI anchor biosynthesis ERa ++ ++
RPL13B YMR142C Translation Cytoplasma ++ ++
SLM1 YIL105C Actin cytoskeleton organization Cytoplasm–plasma
membrane associatedd
++ +
SWA2 YDR320C Vesicular transport ERb ++ +

GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol. The phenotypes are categorized as follows: wild type–like, −; weak, +; medium, ++; strong, +++. Examples are given in Fig. 2.

a

GFP localization database; University of California, San Fransisco.

b

Inferred from direct assays.

c

Inferred from site of activity.

d

This study.