Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Educ Psychol. 2008 Nov;100(4):829–850. doi: 10.1037/a0012657

Table 2.

Correlations among Study Variablesa

Correlations
Pre
Post
Language
Attention
Dynamic Assessment
Calculations
Word Problems
Word Problems-FT
Word Problems-NT
Variable Treatb GC LC V MR S13 S56 S79 DA1 DA2 DA3 A S M AL1 RW I AP AL2
Pretreatment Performance
 Language
  Grammatic Closure (GC) --c
  Listening Comp. (LC) -- 59
  Vocabulary (V) -- 55 57
 Nonverbal Reasoning
  Matrix Reasoning (MR) -- 17 24 23
 Attention
  SWAN 1–3 (S13) -- 36 33 42 21
  SWAN 4–6 (S46) -- 36 30 38 19 93
  SWAN 7–9 (S79 -- 34 29 37 10 90 93
 Dynamic Assessment
  DA1 -- 30 30 29 50 36 33 29
  DA2 -- 36 37 35 44 43 43 37 58
  DA3 -- 20 27 33 29 20 15 07 28 35
 Calculations
  Add Facts (A) -- 14 17 25 29 41 43 37 46 37 17
  Subtract Facts (S) -- 18 17 25 28 39 42 35 39 42 28 73
  Mixed Algorithms (M) -- 17 17 20 24 43 47 40 40 47 24 62 64
 Word Problems
  Algorithmic Word Problems (AL1) -- 36 39 34 35 43 41 34 42 51 25 34 37 32
Outcomes
 Word Problems-Far Transfer (FT)
  Real-World Word Problems (RW) 20 38 45 48 41 53 50 42 41 58 34 40 43 44 67
  Iowa (I) 07 44 50 44 38 50 46 42 48 52 36 34 42 36 64 66
  WJ Applied Problems (AP) 05 39 45 46 46 45 49 42 60 68 36 52 52 57 61 66 67
 Word Problems-Near Transfer (NT)
  Algorithmic Word Problems (AL2) 69 23 26 19 14 33 36 32 24 30 09 22 17 31 43 49 40 39
  Complex Word Problems (C) 65 25 26 22 11 37 37 33 23 29 07 24 15 28 45 54 41 39 82
a

Add decimal to each number (e.g., 59 is .59).

b

Treat is treatment condition, where 1=conventional instruction on word problems and 2=validated SBI on word problems.

c

The correlation between treatment condition and the dimensions of pretreatment performance were set to zero, given random assignment to treatment.